" Why are things the way they are? " frowned David as he placed his beer on the low table in front of the pub-fireplace. We were back in the Eva Hart pub, and ready to plunge into our most complex conversation yet. " I mean, why haven't we questioned these things? " Chapter four of ' Schools of Conversion: 12 Marks of a New Monasticism' is entitled, 'Lament for Racial Divisions Within the Church and Our Communities Combined with the Active Pursuit of a Just Reconciliation' , and it's not an easy chapter. The author asks provocative questions about the normalisation of 'Black churches' and 'white churches' (w e don't use that term of course, but that doesn't mean they don't exist ) amongst multi-cultural communities. " The vast number of churches, whether consciously or not, are ethnic-specific. How should this ongoing existence of different church worlds be named? Is it a sign of diversity and 'cultural preference' to be celebrated - the gifts of different worship styles, finding a church that's comfortable for me, a spiritual refuge of familiar songs, liturgies, even beats on which we clap? Is it an innocent matter of prefering to share the Christian life with people like me, doing no harm to others? Or do we name these different worlds as a segregated Sabbath, a sign internet conference call of deep-seated racialisation and division? " Or maybe we name it as both? " I really want to get my head around this, " added Ian .

My decision to shed my anonymity has some consequences for how I think about the MLA and how I write about it. "Imagine" I went to a panel in which I heard the following statements in this order: I didn't have time to think about this. This goes way beyond dialectic. I'm talking paradox here! I wish I had 15 minutes to talk about zero. How do I represent this in words? I can't. But I brought lots of examples. What? What is that? I had to think really really hard about that. Dare I say it? "Everybody gets it wrong." Not that I get it right. We need to have a BREAKOUT! As an atheist, I have a thing. I have ( holds up three sheets of paper ) one paragraph one click dvd copy left. I shouldn't say anything about this because I haven't thought about it yet. ( trying to recall the title of a book ) The [place] something something something and [place] something or whatever. I can't believe I'm telling you this. I am BREAKING OUT! Really there's nothing really there but I think it's important. I had to alter a few of those (and excise some of the best) because then the victim would be able to recognize him or herself. Were I still anonymous this post would have been far funnier. I don't recount this for its sheer entertainment value. (Though I could.) What strikes me about this "imaginary" performance is its breathtaking unprofessionalism. Now you could complain that I'm unfair because written language works differently than spoken language.

Truly, I have much to learn. Tonight I am learning "How to Fight Noisily and With Much Gusto" courtesy of my neighbours. This particular couple has been living next door to us for several months. We get along. Let me be specific: Hubby and I get along with Him, Hubby and I get along with Her, Hubby and I get along with each other. Apparently the missing key to this puzzle is, He does not get along with Her. At first, I suspected PMS. This may still deal memo hold true, if one goes by the strictest of definitions, P utting up with M en's S hit. He seems pleasant enough. Then again, so does She. Yes, that should read Her for consistency's sake; stretch a little with me There is nothing cyclical about the fighting, unless one considers EVERY DAY to be a cycle unto itself. Then I suspected MONEY. This may hold true, since money is generally the number one reason for couples to fight (in North America). He seems to work (on shifts). She seems to work (on shifts). Their arguments don't seem to involve words related to money, unless one considers GET OUT, I'VE HAD ENOUGH OF YOUR SHIT to be financial terms. Tonight's fiery flare-up started around 5:22 PM. One of them arrived home exactly one minute after me; I arrived home at 5:20 PM WTF could possibly create a huge argument in less than two minutes? Dear gord, it takes me at least fifteen minutes to work up enough energy to cough, never mind scream at full volume.

In a hurry in Moscow (Russia, not Idaho)? Well, if you have the $$$, you can roll through town in an official (rented) police motorcade, complete with sirens, police cars and the flashing "blue" lights which mean "big shot" in Moscow. Here's how the NY TIMES reported all this: A rental car agency in this capital of fast deals but snail-paced traffic advertised an unusual service for those with plenty of money but little time: rent-a-motorcade. Business Car Service promised to provide as an escort an actual police car and two traffic policemen for eight hours at a cost of only $900. The car is equipped with a siren and, most important, a flashing blue light to get you places fast. The service — which has been suspended after a public outcry about the proliferation of blue lights — is a sign not just of how horrendous traffic has become in Moscow but also of the blurry line between wealth and state authority that is characteristic of Russia these days. The many sirens, flashing blue lights and police escorts in Moscow have provided government employees — and more than a few rich people — with relief from intractable how to earn traffic problems, though they tend to make the traffic worse for everyone else. The blue lights, or migalki, are affixed to the roofs of official cars like those in the motorcade of President Vladimir Putin. The problem is, there are now thousands of these cars, sometimes seen wheeling into grocery store parking lots or, insidiously, parked outside casinos.

In a hurry in Moscow (Russia, not Idaho)? Well, if you have the $$$, you can roll through town in an official (rented) police motorcade, complete with sirens, police cars and the flashing "blue" lights which mean "big shot" in Moscow. Here's how the NY TIMES reported all this: A rental car agency in this capital of fast deals but snail-paced traffic advertised an unusual service for those with plenty of money but little time: rent-a-motorcade. Business Car Service promised to provide as an escort an actual police car and two traffic policemen for eight hours at a cost of only $900. The car is equipped with a siren and, most important, a flashing blue light to get you places fast. The service — which has been suspended after a public outcry about the proliferation of blue lights — is a sign not just of how horrendous traffic has become in Moscow but also of the blurry line between wealth and state authority that is characteristic of Russia these days. The many sirens, flashing blue lights and police escorts in Moscow have provided government employees — and more than a few rich people — with relief from intractable traffic problems, though they tend to make the traffic worse for everyone else. The blue lights, or migalki, are affixed to the roofs of official cars like those in the motorcade of President Vladimir Putin. The problem is, there are now thousands of these cars, sometimes seen wheeling into grocery store parking lots or, insidiously, find files linux parked outside casinos.

Truly, I have much to learn. Tonight I am learning "How to Fight Noisily and With Much Gusto" courtesy of my neighbours. This particular couple has been living next door to us for several months. We get along. Let me be specific: Hubby and I get along with Him, Hubby and I get along with Her, Hubby and I get along with each other. Apparently the missing key to this puzzle is, He does not get along with Her. At first, I suspected PMS. This may still hold true, if one goes by the strictest of definitions, P utting up with M en's S hit. He seems pleasant enough. Then again, so does She. Yes, that should read Her for consistency's sake; stretch a little with me There is nothing cyclical about the fighting, unless one considers EVERY DAY to be a cycle unto itself. Then I suspected MONEY. This may hold true, since money is generally the number one reason for couples to fight (in North America). He seems to work (on shifts). She seems to work (on shifts). Their arguments don't seem to involve words related to money, unless one considers GET OUT, I'VE HAD ENOUGH OF YOUR SHIT to be financial terms. Tonight's fiery flare-up started around 5:22 PM. One of them arrived home exactly one minute after me; I arrived home at 5:20 PM WTF could possibly create a huge argument in less than two minutes? Dear gord, it takes me at least fifteen minutes to work up enough energy to cough, never mind retail merchant services scream at full volume.

Truly, I have much to learn. Tonight I am learning "How to Fight Noisily and With Much Gusto" courtesy of my neighbours. This particular couple has been living next door to us for several months. We get along. Let me be specific: Hubby and I get along with Him, Hubby and I get along with Her, Hubby and I get along with each other. Apparently the missing key to this puzzle is, He does not get along with Her. At first, I suspected PMS. This may still hold true, if one goes by the strictest of definitions, P utting up with M en's S hit. He seems pleasant enough. Then again, so does She. Yes, that should read Her for consistency's sake; stretch a little with me There is nothing cyclical about the fighting, unless one considers EVERY DAY to be a cycle savings retirement calculator unto itself. Then I suspected MONEY. This may hold true, since money is generally the number one reason for couples to fight (in North America). He seems to work (on shifts). She seems to work (on shifts). Their arguments don't seem to involve words related to money, unless one considers GET OUT, I'VE HAD ENOUGH OF YOUR SHIT to be financial terms. Tonight's fiery flare-up started around 5:22 PM. One of them arrived home exactly one minute after me; I arrived home at 5:20 PM WTF could possibly create a huge argument in less than two minutes? Dear gord, it takes me at least fifteen minutes to work up enough energy to cough, never mind scream at full volume.

by emptywheel The most telling detail from Team Libby's response in support of bond pending appeal is this one: Lawrence Robbins (D.C. Bar No. 420260) Robbins, Russell, Englert, Orseck and Untereiner Team Libby has added a lawyer. A lawyer who specializes in championing cases before SCOTUS. Robbins, Russell spins courtroom losses into U.S. Supreme Court wins. [snip] Its lawyers have argued six cases before the U.S. Supreme Court, including two back-to-back one morning in December 2002. It has four wins and one split decision. [this was written in 2005] [snip] "They ae basically a portable appellate department," Said lawyer has brought an entirely different tone to the response brief: nasty and a bit disingenuous. As one example: The government virtually concedes that, if this case is controlled by the "direction search engine optimization missouri and supervision" test set forth Edmond v. United States ... then Mr. Libby's Appointments Clause challenge presents (at the least) a "close" question for appeal. But the government did no such thing. The government points out that Edmond states that removability at will is a "powerful tool for control," which is a detail the Defense likes to gloss over. This Court stated that it “would have no basis for adopting the view that an inferior officer must be under active day-to-day supervision. Rather, an inferior officer’s work must be simply be ‘directed and supervised at some level.’” Id.

" Why are things the way they are? " frowned David as he placed his beer on the low table in front of the pub-fireplace. We were back in the Eva Hart pub, and ready to plunge into our most complex conversation yet. " I mean, why haven't we questioned these things? " Chapter four of ' Schools of Conversion: 12 Marks of a New Monasticism' is entitled, 'Lament for Racial Divisions Within the Church and Our Communities Combined with the Active Pursuit of a Just Reconciliation' , and it's not an easy chapter. The author asks provocative questions about the normalisation of 'Black churches' and 'white churches' (w e don't use that term of course, but that doesn't mean they don't exist ) amongst multi-cultural communities. " The vast number of churches, whether consciously or not, are ethnic-specific. How should this ongoing existence of free outlook express spam filter different church worlds be named? Is it a sign of diversity and 'cultural preference' to be celebrated - the gifts of different worship styles, finding a church that's comfortable for me, a spiritual refuge of familiar songs, liturgies, even beats on which we clap? Is it an innocent matter of prefering to share the Christian life with people like me, doing no harm to others? Or do we name these different worlds as a segregated Sabbath, a sign of deep-seated racialisation and division? " Or maybe we name it as both? " I really want to get my head around this, " added Ian .

by emptywheel The most telling detail from Team Libby's response in support of bond pending appeal is this one: Lawrence Robbins (D.C. Bar No. 420260) Robbins, Russell, Englert, Orseck and Untereiner Team Libby has added a lawyer. A lawyer who specializes in championing cases before SCOTUS. Robbins, Russell spins courtroom losses into U.S. Supreme Court wins. [snip] Its lawyers have argued six cases before the U.S. Supreme Court, including two back-to-back one morning in December speed bumps 2002. It has four wins and one split decision. [this was written in 2005] [snip] "They ae basically a portable appellate department," Said lawyer has brought an entirely different tone to the response brief: nasty and a bit disingenuous. As one example: The government virtually concedes that, if this case is controlled by the "direction and supervision" test set forth Edmond v. United States ... then Mr. Libby's Appointments Clause challenge presents (at the least) a "close" question for appeal. But the government did no such thing. The government points out that Edmond states that removability at will is a "powerful tool for control," which is a detail the Defense likes to gloss over. This Court stated that it “would have no basis for adopting the view that an inferior officer must be under active day-to-day supervision. Rather, an inferior officer’s work must be simply be ‘directed and supervised at some level.’” Id.

Click Here

Click Here

" Why are things the way they are? " frowned David as he placed his beer on the low table in front of the pub-fireplace. We were back in the Eva Hart pub, and ready to plunge into our most complex conversation yet. " I mean, why haven't we questioned these things? " Chapter four of ' Schools of Conversion: 12 Marks of a New Monasticism' is entitled, 'Lament for Racial Divisions Within the Church and Our Communities Combined with the Active Pursuit of a Just Reconciliation' , and it's not an easy chapter. The author asks provocative questions about the normalisation of 'Black churches' and 'white churches' (w e don't use that term of course, but that doesn't mean they don't exist ) amongst multi-cultural communities. " The vast number of churches, whether consciously or not, are ethnic-specific. How should this ongoing existence of different church worlds be named? Is it a sign of diversity and 'cultural preference' to be celebrated - the gifts of different worship styles, finding a church that's comfortable for me, a spiritual refuge of familiar songs, liturgies, even beats on which we clap? Is it an innocent matter of prefering to share the Christian life with people like me, doing no watches online store harm to others? Or do we name these different worlds as a segregated Sabbath, a sign of deep-seated racialisation and division? " Or maybe we name it as both? " I really want to get my head around this, " added Ian .

Click Here

My decision to shed my anonymity has some consequences for how I think about the MLA and how I write about it. "Imagine" log off I went to a panel in which I heard the following statements in this order: I didn't have time to think about this. This goes way beyond dialectic. I'm talking paradox here! I wish I had 15 minutes to talk about zero. How do I represent this in words? I can't. But I brought lots of examples. What? What is that? I had to think really really hard about that. Dare I say it? "Everybody gets it wrong." Not that I get it right. We need to have a BREAKOUT! As an atheist, I have a thing. I have ( holds up three sheets of paper ) one paragraph left. I shouldn't say anything about this because I haven't thought about it yet. ( trying to recall the title of a book ) The [place] something something something and [place] something or whatever. I can't believe I'm telling you this. I am BREAKING OUT! Really there's nothing really there but I think it's important. I had to alter a few of those (and excise some of the best) because then the victim would be able to recognize him or herself. Were I still anonymous this post would have been far funnier. I don't recount this for its sheer entertainment value. (Though I could.) What strikes me about this "imaginary" performance is its breathtaking unprofessionalism. Now you could complain that I'm unfair because written language works differently than spoken language.

My decision to shed my anonymity has some consequences for how I think about the MLA and how I write about it. "Imagine" I went to a panel in which I heard the following statements in this order: I didn't have time to think about this. This goes way beyond dialectic. I'm talking paradox here! I wish I had 15 minutes to talk about zero. How do I represent this in words? I can't. But I brought lots of examples. What? What is that? I had to think really really hard about that. Dare I say it? "Everybody gets it wrong." Not that I get it right. We need to have a BREAKOUT! As an atheist, I have a thing. I have ( holds up three sheets of paper ) one paragraph left. I shouldn't say anything about this because I haven't thought about it yet. ( trying to recall the title of a book ) The [place] something something something and [place] something or whatever. I can't believe I'm telling you this. I am BREAKING OUT! Really there's nothing really there but I think it's important. I had to alter a few of those (and excise some of the best) because then the victim would be able to recognize him or herself. Were I still anonymous this post would have been far funnier. I don't recount this for its sheer entertainment value. (Though I could.) What strikes me about this "imaginary" performance is its breathtaking unprofessionalism. Now you theft identity protection could complain that I'm unfair because written language works differently than spoken language.